Samsung Galaxy S7 Vs Samsung A5
Retail package
It'southward easy to tell the Samsung Galaxy S7 is the more upscale model. It has a improve pair of in-ear headphones packed in a prissy carrying case, and y'all get a microUSB to full-size USB adapter if yous need to plug in accessories (to transfer information or only to charge them upwardly).
Galaxy A5 (2016) box • ... and contents • Galaxy S7'south is fancier • ...and packs more
Both phones come up with a standard Samsung Fast charger and a USB cablevision.
Cheaper, just just every bit good? No, not really. You may not demand the better headset or the USB adapter, but when information technology comes to value-for-coin, the more you get, the better.
Design
The Samsung Milky way S7 has a smoothen body with rounded corners and glass on the forepart and back. The glass gently curves into the metal frame. While looks are subjective, the S7 has the better ergonomics as A5'due south flat front and back don't sit besides in hand.
The Galaxy A5 (2016) weighs practically the aforementioned equally the S7, but is slightly thinner - 7.3mm vs. seven.9mm - if that'south something y'all care about. And don't worry about the battery, the divergence is tiny (2,900mAh and 3,000mAh respectively).
A5 (2016) has slightly sharper corners • The S7 is a chip more fluid
Both phones plainly come from the aforementioned mold, however, with their exposed metal frame, Gorilla Drinking glass iv on the front and back, the front adorned with a fingerprint-reading hardware Home button. Even the side buttons are positioned identically, so they are as easy to achieve on both devices.
Concrete Dwelling with fingerprint reader • Volume rocker on the left • Same hither, same here
Around back, the S7 has an boosted sensor that the A5 lacks - a heart charge per unit sensor - but more importantly, its camera is nearly flush with the back while the 13MP shooter of the A-serial sticks out more than prominently.
Photographic camera and a lonely LED on the A5 (2016) • The S7 adds a heart rate sensor to those
That's one of the reasons why we don't mind that the Galaxy S7 is a fraction of a millimeter thicker. Another reason is the IP68 rating, which gives information technology improved resistance to the elements - specifically it tin survive underwater (1.5m deep or more, though you shouldn't endeavor and discover the limit).
Both phones offer microSD slots and depending on the exact sub-model it can be a defended slot or information technology tin trade places with SIM2. The Galaxy A5 (2016) just comes with 16GB of built-in storage so yous'll need a retention card, while you may be able to squeak by with S7's 32GB. At that place'due south a 64GB model too - games will capeesh the fast and roomy UFS 2.0 storage, multimedia files will not care.
Galaxy A5 (2016) menu tray on the side • ...with a hybrid slot • On top of the S7 • ...hybrid nonetheless
Cheaper, but simply as expert? You know what, we think we tin can live with the design of the Milky way A5 (2016). The shine curves of the Galaxy S7 are more appealing to our eyes and easily, but not plenty to pay extra but for that.
Screen
"Super AMOLED" has become synonymous with the screens of flagship Galaxy phones, and these two are no exception. They are about the same size - the A5 slightly bigger at five.ii" vs. 5.one" - and both displays are flat (the 2.5D beveled Gorilla Drinking glass iv above them is not).
You'll find that the S7 screen has QHD resolution against the 1080p of the A5. Super AMOLED does expect meliorate with some extra sharpness, simply at this screen diagonal, the pixel density really only makes a difference in Virtual Reality (VR). And A5'southward GPU is no adept for VR anyhow, and so if that'due south a consideration for you, you lot may as well order the S7 and a Gear VR at present.
For regular usage, both screens deliver similar image quality - that is to say an amazing image quality. The rich colors, deep blacks and overall punchiness of an AMOLED screen is Samsung'south forte.
For those thinking "ugh, AMOLED colors", the Basic display mode delivers the best color accuracy in the business. Surprisingly, the Milky way A5 (2016) comes out ahead with a lower average deltaE, i.3 vs. 1.vii, though that's nitpicking. Nosotros tend to prefer the less accurate, merely punchier Adaptive mode, but accuracy is in that location if you need it.
| Display exam | 100% effulgence | ||
| Blackness, cd/one thousand2 | White, cd/m2 | | |
| | 0.00 | 421 | ∞ |
| | 0.00 | 601 | ∞ |
| | 0.00 | 391 | ∞ |
| | 0.00 | 563 | ∞ |
The A5 screen holds its own regarding effulgence too - it'south brighter that the S7 screen in both manual and auto modes. However, despite this, it does slightly worse in sunlight legibility. In the dark, the Super AMOLED screens can deliver as little as ii nits so they won't bullheaded you.
Sunlight contrast ratio
- Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+
four.615 - Samsung Galaxy S7 edge
4.439 - OnePlus 3
4.424 - Samsung Galaxy S7
4.376 - HTC One A9
four.274 - Samsung Galaxy Note7
iv.247 - Samsung Milky way A3
4.241 - OnePlus 3T
4.232 - Google Pixel XL
four.164 - ZTE Axon seven
4.154 - Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
4.124 - Samsung Milky way Note5
four.09 - Huawei Nexus 6P
4.019 - OnePlus X
3.983 - Vivo Xplay5 Aristocracy
iii.983 - Apple iPhone 7
3.964 - Oppo R7s
three.964 - Huawei P9 Plus
3.956 - Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)
3.918 - Samsung Galaxy C5
3.911 - Samsung Galaxy C7
3.896 - Samsung Galaxy A5
3.895 - Samsung Galaxy J7 outdoor
3.879 - Samsung Galaxy J2 outdoor
3.873 - Samsung Milky way A8
3.859 - Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)
three.817 - Motorola Moto X (2014)
3.816 - Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016) outdoor manner
three.802 - Xiaomi Redmi Pro
three.798 - LG V20 Max auto
iii.798 - Sony Xperia XZ
3.795 - Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)
3.789 - Apple iPhone 6s
3.783 - Meizu Pro five
3.781 - Microsoft Lumia 650
3.772 - Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)
iii.756 - Oppo F1 Plus
iii.709 - Vivo X5Pro
3.706 - Sony Xperia X Compact
three.694 - Apple iPhone SE
3.681 - Huawei Mate 9
3.68 - Samsung Galaxy A7
iii.679 - Meizu PRO 6
iii.659 - BlackBerry Priv
3.645 - Apple iPhone seven Plus
3.588 - Apple iPhone 6s Plus
3.53 - Motorola Moto Z Play
3.526 - Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) outdoor fashion
3.523 - Samsung Milky way J3 (2016)
three.523 - Acer Jade Primo
3.521 - Microsoft Lumia 950
iii.512 - Oppo R7 Plus
iii.499 - nubia Z11
3.466 - Samsung Galaxy J7
3.422 - Meizu MX5
3.416 - LG V20
iii.402 - Oppo R9s
three.352 - Oppo R7
3.32 - Xiaomi Mi 5s
3.276 - Samsung Galaxy J2
3.235 - Sony Xperia X Performance
iii.234 - Xiaomi Mi Note two
3.228 - Motorola Moto X Play
iii.222 - Huawei P9
3.195 - Lenovo Vibe Shot
iii.113 - Motorola Moto X Force
3.105 - LG Nexus 5X
iii.092 - Huawei Mate S
3.073 - Microsoft Lumia 640 XL
3.065 - Sony Xperia X
two.989 - Huawei Mate 8
two.949 - Xiaomi Redmi 3S
ii.913 - Sony Xperia XA Ultra
2.906 - LG G5
ii.905 - HTC One Southward
2.901 - Xiaomi Redmi 3s Prime
2.893 - Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
2.884 - Sony Xperia Z5
2.876 - Microsoft Lumia 550
2.851 - Xiaomi Redmi 3 Pro
two.803 - Sony Xperia Z5 meaty
2.784 - Meizu MX6
ii.751 - LG V10
two.744 - Xiaomi Redmi 3
2.735 - Sony Xperia M5
2.69 - Huawei P9 Lite
ii.679 - Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime
2.679 - Vivo V3Max
two.659 - Xiaomi Mi Mix
2.658 - Xiaomi Mi 4i
2.641 - Sony Xperia XA
2.609 - Motorola Moto G4 Plus (max motorcar)
2.582 - Motorola Moto G4 Plus
ii.582 - Xiaomi Mi 4c
2.574 - LeEco Le Max 2
2.567 - Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
ii.563 - Microsoft Lumia 640
ii.563 - Lenovo Moto G4
2.544 - Oppo F1
2.528 - Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
two.525 - Huawei Honor 7 Lite / Honor 5c
two.506 - Sony Xperia M4 Aqua
two.503 - Oppo F1s
2.481 - Motorola Moto G
2.477 - Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus
two.473 - Huawei G8
2.471 - Huawei nova
ii.467 - Sony Xperia Z
2.462 - Lenovo Vibe K5
two.459 - Meizu m3 max
2.447 - Huawei Honor seven
ii.406 - Sony Xperia E5
2.386 - ZUK Z1 by Lenovo
ii.382 - HTC 10
2.378 - Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)
2.378 - Meizu m1 note
ii.362 - Huawei nova plus
2.329 - HTC I E9+
ii.305 - Alcatel Ane Affect Hero
two.272 - Apple iPhone 4S
2.269 - Lenovo Vibe K4 Notation
2.254 - Sony Xperia C5 Ultra
2.253 - Xiaomi Redmi Note three (MediaTek)
2.249 - Sony Xperia C4 Dual
2.235 - Xiaomi Mi Note
ii.234 - Motorola Moto Thousand (2014)
2.233 - LG Nexus 5
2.228 - Huawei P8
2.196 - Huawei Honour vi
2.169 - Xiaomi Redmi Annotation 2
two.166 - OnePlus Two
two.165 - HTC One Ten
2.158 - LG Aka
two.145 - Xiaomi Redmi Note iv
2.145 - Archos fifty Diamond
2.134 - Xiaomi Redmi Note
ii.119 - Acer Liquid X2
two.084 - Huawei P8lite
2.078 - Moto G 3rd gen max manual
two.026 - Xiaomi Mi Max
1.996 - Sony Xperia E4g
1.972 - OnePlus One
1.961 - Meizu m3 note
ane.923 - Meizu m2 note
1.892 - BlackBerry Leap
1.892 - ZTE Nubia Z9 mini
i.759 - Sony Xperia U
1.758 - Asus Zenfone Selfie
1.68 - Motorola Moto East (2nd Gen)
1.675 - ZTE Nubia Z9
ane.659 - Jolla Jolla
1.605 - Motorola Moto E
ane.545 - Sony Xperia Yard
1.473 - HTC Desire C
ane.3 - Sony Xperia C
i.283 - Meizu MX
1.221 - Sony Xperia Eastward
1.215
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a hidden ace though - its Ever On Brandish (AOD) is great at delivering notifications and is surprisingly useful even for simple things like checking the time and engagement.
We're quite impressed by the caliber of the screen that the Milky way A5 (2016) delivers, though in that location's a big "but" coming. Its PWM-driven, which means you may notice a flicker, which becomes more credible as the brightness goes down. Nigh people are non sensitive to this and may not fifty-fifty notice it (the backlighting on many desktop monitors runs this mode too), but if y'all tend to notice screen flicker, so the A5 may not be for you.
Cheaper, but just every bit skilful? We're divided. If we put aside VR (which is niche) and the Always On screen (which nosotros think is awesome), the Milky way A5 (2016) screen tin can rub shoulders with flagships. The screen flicker is a potential deal-billow though, if possible get some hands-on time in a brick and mortar store before y'all commit to purchasing.
Battery
While the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016) starts with a small disadvantage - 100mAh less in battery chapters - it turns out that one of the flagship features on the Galaxy S7 has a much more meaningful impact.
The E'er On Display feature surely takes its toll on the Endurance rating. Over again, we think information technology's a great feature that brings a lot of value. If you don't employ it, this would bring the S7 to near-A5 levels of battery Endurance. We're certain that virtually people will nonetheless pick AOD fifty-fifty if it ways more frequent charging. Also, note that AOD automatically turns off when you take the phone in your pocket or pocketbook or when information technology's pitch night, so it won't exist that bad on your battery life as our test suggets every bit it assumes the feature is on 24h per mean solar day.
The Galaxy A5 (2016) gets a 90 hour Endurance rating - a huge improvement over the S7 with AOD and a small-scale but decent crash-land over the S7 without AOD. This is all due to the more efficient standby of the A5, the results from the individual tests are essentially equal to those of the S7.
Note that these numbers are for the A5 with the Snapdragon 615 chipset and at that place'due south an Exynos 7580 version that we oasis't tested.
Both phones back up Fast charging and come with the needed wall charger for it on most markets. For the Milky way S7, Samsung quotes 0% to 100% charging in 90 minutes only gives no similar numbers for the A5.
The Milky way S7 also has wireless charging (supporting both Qi and PMA standards), and this manner can top up the battery quite quickly besides (not as fast as wired charging, but faster than standard wireless charging).
Cheaper, but only as good? For the most part, yep, you might say even better. Even if you disable AOD on the S7, you can wait the A5 to last slightly longer. We think wireless charging is a convenience, only not a necessity.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Vs Samsung A5,
Source: https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s7_vs_galaxy_a5_2016-review-1542p2.php
Posted by: haynessacint.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Samsung Galaxy S7 Vs Samsung A5"
Post a Comment